In the 1980s, two Soviet artists-in-exile, Vitaly Komar and Alexander Melamid, painted the head of Josef Stalin, freed from its body and perched on a woman's hand. Judith on the Red Square was just the latest take on another historical moment that may also never have happened. Consider Komar and Melamid's version together with those below, then discuss with your team: what story inspired them, and how do their styles and meanings vary? Is there a difference between showing the act of the beheading and just its aftermath? And, if, as critics argue, they celebrate the trope of "female rage", should we still be studying any of them?

**Judith Beheading Holofernes | Caravaggio**

**Judith Slaying Holofernes | Artemisia Gentileschi**

**Judith and the Head of Holofernes | Gustav Klimt**

**Judith and Holofernes | Pedro Americo**

**Judith and Holofernes | Kehinde Wiley**

(i recommend comparing the artworks than its description it was based one, sorry pedro americo is kind of a nugu artist)

He could be a Super Junior (like the kpop band???)—in 2022, the 10-year-old Andres Valencia painted Invasion of Ukraine, a work modeled on Pablo Picasso's 1937 Cubist classic Guernica. Where Picasso portrayed, in fractured screams, the German bombing of a small Basque town, Valencia saw a chance to critique the similar horror of Russia's recent aggression. Examine both works and those below, then discuss with your team: how does each vary from the original, and to what end? Have any other artists created new works about Guernica based on the actual attack, rather than on Picasso's painting? Should Valencia have tried to find a more original approach, or was it a good choice to make his work a homage to an established masterpiece? And, would Valencia's painting be seen differently if he were an adult—or Ukrainian?

**Backyard Guernica and Saskatoon Guernica | Adad Hannah**